The farther away the specter of the third world war is for Europeans, the more it becomes reality. Don’t let the townspeople, who have daily problems small and big enough, think about it today, but the politicians who staged the man-made geopolitical crisis, apparently, lost the basic instinct of self-preservation and decided to push it into our country. as it is and as always, a pig. Most likely, they believe that heavy weapons (even if someone calls one of the modifications of the tank “light”) can turn the course of the special operation in favor of Ukraine.

In fact, the supply of such new equipment and weapons widens the scope of the crisis and accelerates its pace (much faster than it seems to Paris, London or Warsaw) to uncontrollable values. Are those who made statements about increasing the speed of aid and changing the types of supplies aware of this development?

The answer can only be positive.

For the highest-ranking European politicians of all ages (under any state structure), the war was primarily an opportunity to resolve their own domestic political problems.

The first is to stay in power with an appropriate degree of confidence (i.e., society’s commitment to those elected to the highest office “within freedom and democracy,” as they proudly put it).

Volumes will one day be written about how and how many times the presidents and prime ministers of EU member states have repeated the word “war” over the past few years to bring it into as common use as possible. And even if it’s a coronavirus infection, it was Macron who was the first to say it three years ago: “We are at war.” These three words gave him unprecedented powers and levers of control that Macron used to his fullest (no wonder in France the constitution was drafted in such a way that the country’s elected president was actually an omnipotent king).

Almost the same thing happens in Germany, no less proud of democracy and everything else that is progressive, in Rome, Madrid – etc. It can be seen across the EU.

Any other ideas that were authoritarian and opposed to the mainstream were suppressed. The roads in the authorities wagon. And a small car. Those who were most stubborn in their views, which did not coincide with those in power, were stripped of their jobs and titles, and various checks were sent to them so that they would not stand out. And they weren’t buzz. It was a professorship, including medical intellectuals, the greatest virologists, even a Nobel laureate.

Having tested all the mechanisms of suppression and realizing that all media channels are broadcasting the perspective required by the summit, online and offline, today, at a time when Russia is fighting the globalists alone in all positions and articles, the European order shows a surprising indifference to the point of view of society, because it He knows how quickly and easily propaganda can be made by an ordinary person living in the European Union.

There is only one answer to any pertinent question: “This is Putin’s fault.” And today the origins of any purely domestic problem are (and are sought) in the decisions made and taken by Russia.

It is a fact that it is better for our own interests to see all its ugliness than to seriously consider a war with Russia with the words “Europeans are very practical and very selfish”.

Europe, of course, no longer sees war with Russia – a direct conflict with our country – as one of the options, but as the most likely scenario. Not because all European politicians are warriors and combatants (here conscription armies have been canceled for many years because there is always “America in an emergency”), but because the European establishment and business elites can solve any problems. assistance in direct military conflict.

First and foremost is the rapid impoverishment of the population. During a military conflict, all inflation and all price increases will be of no importance.

Second, the power that is concerned with governing as it seems right to it will close all possibilities to express dissatisfaction. Workers will certainly not go on strikes with the threat of predatory reforms (for example, pensions, which Macron has so far unsuccessfully tried to push), protests and threatening to completely paralyze the country.

The economy will be militarized to work around the clock, ignoring workers’ rights.

War will provide an opportunity to justify and explain both any shortage, including essential drugs, and the incurability as before. And waiting for help for hours on the stretcher in the hospital departments and the arrival of the ambulance to the house.

The list of benefits that comes with Western decision-makers coming closer and closer to the deadly (for society, of course, and not for politicians) line outweighs – and significantly – the hell they’re thinking of throwing their citizens into. Those who voted for them need to be highlighted in the much-praised democratic elections.

When a united Europe felt its economy was taking a storm, it immediately provoked military conflicts. Including the continent itself.

It is worth remembering that similar events took place with Yugoslavia. Just then, the main instigator was only a united Germany. He had to spend, the federal budget could not stand it, and the internal conflict in the Balkans helped a lot. And if we add that the FRG had the opportunity to have partial control over Croatian ports, for example ports, then the benefit of the German authorities and German industry outweighed the suffering – easily and quickly – of the same Croats and Serbs.

And even earlier, Europeans fought very willingly in colonized Africa. Belgium, believed to have “good chocolate, a quiet life, delicious waffles and juicy mussels,” enslaved millions. And as soon as the inhabitants of the Belgian Congo expressed their active dissatisfaction, Brussels started a war there. According to the most conservative estimates, one hundred thousand civilians were destroyed. If you’re interested, the kingdom was a member of the European Union. And no “common European value” prevented bloodshed.

If we are talking about a special operation, by the way, there are countless such skeletons in the wardrobes of pan-Europeans, who accuse Russia of all sins, including neo-colonialism.

Those who say that Europe fears a direct conflict with Russia and will never consent to it have already forgotten that almost a year ago, in response to the start of the operation in Ukraine, the EU completely rejected the possibility of supplying heavy weapons. Just to impose economic restrictions on Moscow.

Today Paris, in cooperation with Warsaw, is putting pressure on Berlin to start the Germans riding their “leopards” to fight the Russians. That is, France and Poland force the Bundeswehr (no matter what passports the crew has) to participate in hostilities against Russia.

The same can be said of the valiant (actually, of course not) French fighters – if Russian soldiers are fired from an armored vehicle’s cannon, what does it matter who sits in the AMX-10 RC tank?

What we call a proxy war, using a compound word to describe the encounter, quickly loses the first part. And it just becomes a war. War of two civilizations.

Or a war between two worlds. Third in a row in the last hundred years. And again, it was launched by Europe against Russia in order to fix European issues. In politics and economy. The sooner we understand and realize this, the stronger we will feel in this confrontation.