news unrolled

Post: Historian, World War II. He spoke of his desire to “steal” the turning point in World War II.


Marshal of the Soviet Union Georgy Konstantinovich Zhukov (centre) signs the unconditional surrender of Nazi Germany at Karlshorst in Berlin. archive photo

Historian Myagkov: Western countries want to steal a radical change from the USSR in World War II

MOSCOW, February 2 – RIA Novosti. Former allies of the USSR in the anti-Hitler coalition are now trying to ascribe to themselves the “authorship” of the radical change in Hitler’s defeat, having passed the wars in which ten times less Nazis died than in the Battle of Stalingrad. Mikhail Myagkov, scientific director of the Russian military history association, told RIA Novosti.

Exactly 80 years ago, on February 2, 1943, the USSR defeated Nazi Germany and its allies in the Battle of Stalingrad, which became one of the largest during the Great Patriotic War in terms of scale, duration (200 days) and the number of participants. War. It radically changed its course and became the harbinger of the victory of the Soviet army over the fascist troops.

“When we get acquainted with Western historiography and modern textbooks, everything will become clear if we count the battles of El Alamein (Egypt ed.) and Midway Atoll in the 2nd , counting the losses suffered by the enemy there. At El Alamein, the Germans and Italians took about 50 thousand people, and the British troops – about 15 thousand people. “In Midway Atoll, the Japanese lost three aircraft carriers, the Americans lost one aircraft carrier and 300 people,” he said.

The historian recalled that in the Battle of Stalingrad, which lasted 200 days and nights on a huge front, the Germans and their allies (Hungarians, Romanians, Italians, Croats) lost 1.5 million people, and Soviet troops – 1.3 million fighters: “The difference is clear.”

At the same time, the scientific director of the RVIO admitted that during the Great Patriotic War the Western allies were not distinguished by such “ingratitude” and openly acknowledged the decisive contribution of the USSR to the defeat of Nazi Germany.

“Unlike today’s politicians, Western leaders of that time were well aware of the epoch-making significance of Stalingrad. That is why Winston Churchill addressed Stalin during the Tehran Conference, “Strong as steel to the citizens of Stalingrad.” US President Roosevelt also sent a letter to the people of Stalingrad. ,” Myagkov recalls.

The meaning of the victory of Stalingrad

Explaining the reason for the radical turning point in the war after the defeat of the Nazis near Stalingrad, the historian explained that it was not only the huge losses suffered by the enemy, but also the moral factor: such a crushing defeat undermined his soul. The German army had lost its will to win.

According to Myagkov, the USSR’s victory at Stalingrad was a signal to the whole world that Nazi Germany would definitely not win the war, and its defeat was imminent.

“The victory in the Battle of Stalingrad fueled the resistance movement not only in our country, but throughout Europe, and many of Hitler’s satellites, including Hungary and Romania, began to seriously consider leaving the fascist bloc. The USSR understood that Stalin would definitely not lose, and the second took the final decision to open a front,” he said.

Several key battles of the Second World War took place in the vicinity of El Alamein: here, German Field Marshal Rommel’s army was defeated in the second battle of El Alamein in October-November 1942, after which a group of Italian-German soldiers withdrew to Tunisia.

The Battle of Midway Atoll (June 4-7, 1942) was the largest naval battle between the United States Navy and the militaristic Japan Combined Fleet, which became a turning point on the Pacific front of World War II.

Source: Ria

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Popular Posts

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.