Guança readers criticized NATO’s response to Putin’s remarks on nuclear weapons in Belarus.
MOSCOW, March 27 – RIA Novosti. Readers of the Chinese edition “Guancha” He criticized the NATO response to Russian President Vladimir Putin’s decision to deploy tactical nuclear weapons in Belarus.
Earlier, NATO spokesperson Oana Lungescu said Russia’s nuclear rhetoric was “dangerous and irresponsible”.
The expert described the deployment of nuclear weapons in Belarus as a necessary measure
“More than once, NATO has shown its arrogance,” one commenter wrote.
“Why doesn’t NATO condemn the US and UK for supplying Australia with nuclear submarines?” someone else asked.
A third said, “The United States and the West intimidate the weak and fear the strong.”
Another user shared the view that “Such a reaction shows that Russia is doing the right thing.”
“They forget about NATO actions, they apply double standards as usual,” the reader concluded.
As Putin explained, the decision on nuclear weapons was made after Britain announced that it was supplying depleted uranium-containing ammunition to Ukraine. The President noted that although they do not belong to weapons of mass destruction, they somehow create radiation dust and are therefore considered dangerous. According to him, crop fields will inevitably become contaminated if they are used, which poses a threat to both local people and the environment.
The EU has threatened sanctions for the deployment of nuclear weapons in Belarus.
I’m Harold O’Connor and I work as an author and editor for News Unrolled, a news website dedicated to delivering the latest world events. With my in-depth research skills, passion for news writing, and keen eye for detail, I strive to provide readers with accurate information on current affairs from around the globe.