Drone expert Fedutinov: Attitudes towards drones at the front are changing
MOSCOW, November 30 – RIA Novosti, Zakhar Andreev. The whole world admires Russian weapons, including Lancet’s stray munitions. However, the military also mentions a significant disadvantage. Read how the problem was solved in the RIA Novosti article.
“BBQ” will not save
We are talking about a cumulative jet, or EFP – explosively generated penetrator, “explosive penetrator”. This weapon makes the nets and grilles installed on armored vehicles almost unusable. Previously, with their help, the Armed Forces of Ukraine more than once repelled attacks from stray ammunition.
Analysts nail Business Insider proposes a new technology for the Lancets: A laser rangefinder from two optical cameras causes an explosion at the optimal distance in front of the target.
Forbes Columnist notes: Protections against EFP are available but do not apply to all equipment. So the Americans installed additional composite armor in Iraq. True, this increased the weight. For example, the three-ton HMMWV vehicle became heavier by four and its maneuverability decreased.
Another method is dynamic protection (DZ) of the “Contact-1” type. It is known that the Ukrainian Armed Forces even planted Soviet boxes with explosives on German Leopards (it helped) not always).
However, this is not suitable for light equipment. “Passive armor should be rolled steel” to explain Sam Cranny-Evans and Sidharth Kaushal from the Royal United Services Institute.
Smarter and further
In addition, Lancet has the ability to operate in autonomous mode: the intelligent system itself searches for targets and even identifies those with higher priority (for example, an air defense facility instead of a howitzer). This is a response to attempts by the Ukrainian Armed Forces to “take down” drones using electronic warfare.
According to Alexander Zakharov, chief designer of the Zala Aero company (manufacturer of Lancets), the enemy now has only one thing left: to try close physically drones. However, this is extremely problematic. Two X-shaped wings (that’s why the operators of this ammunition in the army are called x-wings) provide the product with high maneuverability in all planes.
The range is also growing. In September, another version, probably Izdeliye-53, shot down a Ukrainian MiG-29 at an airfield near Krivoy Rog. And in October it became known that the Su-25 attack aircraft was destroyed there. Approximately 80 kilometers from the launch point. Until now the maximum number was thought to be 40.
The design bureau attached to the Vostok battalion launched the production of cheaper analogues. If the original costs 30-35 thousand dollars, these are only three thousand. Its name is surgery: “Scalpel”. The same X-shaped wings, the launch is also from a catapult.
The concept was announced by Alexander Khodakovsky, founder of the Vostok battalion. He thought modern airplanes were “the epitome of engineering” and that they were too expensive. For this reason, their numbers are very small compared to the more primitive aircraft of the Second World War. However, despite their high technology, attack vehicles are still vulnerable to air defense. This means the possibilities are limited.
“At moments like these, you can’t help feeling nostalgic about the great-grandfathers of our modern miracle machines, of whom there will be many and will break through, not even knowing that someone has caught them on the radar. and bombard the enemy with bombs.” Wrote Officer. “For some reason, I am confident that an attack by our attack aircraft from the Great Patriotic War would radically resolve the situation with the same Urozhayny in our favor and completely deter any desire to repeat attack attempts.”
Khodakovsky suggested that attack aircraft in modern conditions could be made unmanned.
“We are trying to ensure that the operator psychologically perceives the UAV as a consumable and that it does not shake on either side, does not lose its efficiency. At the same time, with the intensive use of cheap weapons, the enemy will overheat – not a single thing. Our air defense system can handle such a load,” he said. spoke. And “Scalpel” appeared.
It won’t get any worse
Experts in the field of unmanned aerial vehicles agree with him: the realities of military conflict force us to rethink the attitude towards unmanned aerial vehicles.
“There is a need not only for stray munitions, initially disposable, but also for reconnaissance unmanned systems in much larger quantities,” says Denis Fedutinov, editor of the special publication Unmanned Aviation.
Due to electronic warfare and kinetic countermeasures at the front, even reusable UAVs have an extremely short lifespan.
“A few flights, really. In fact, they are also consumables,” says the expert.
“Better than ATACMS.” “An analogue of Hypersound” can be transferred to Ukraine
There were high expectations for large aircraft-type UAVs, but real experience in combat operations showed that cheap, small-sized devices are in much greater demand. In general, there is a need for mass production and cheapness.
True, enthusiasts of the Vostok design bureau cannot yet achieve mass participation for objective reasons. They produce no more than 20 cars per month.
However, their experiences should still be considered positive. Fedutinov also believes that close interaction with direct participants in the wars will allow the product to bear fruit.
Another “surgical instrument” is certainly not inappropriate for the Russian army.
I’m Harold O’Connor and I work as an author and editor for News Unrolled, a news website dedicated to delivering the latest world events. With my in-depth research skills, passion for news writing, and keen eye for detail, I strive to provide readers with accurate information on current affairs from around the globe.